Lyrasing documentation
Lyrasing is a pre-launch technical documentation site for a future restaking-native money market on Ethereum. The protocol thesis is narrow: LRTs should be treated as first-class collateral, LTV policy should account for AVS exposure instead of flattening every ETH derivative into one risk bucket, and slashing insurance should be part of the market design rather than a post-hoc risk disclaimer.
This documentation is written for builders, protocol researchers, AVS teams, LRT issuers, risk engineers, and contributors who already understand staking, restaking, and collateralized lending. It does not include retail onboarding, wallet flows, live market data, token claims, deployed-contract references, or supported-collateral lists.
Reading order
Start with Concept to understand the Lyrasing thesis and why an AVS-aware lending market is different from a generic ETH-derivative market. Then use Glossary as the anchor for terminology used across later Phase 3 pages.
The remaining sections define the information architecture for the deeper documentation batches:
| Section | What it owns |
|---|---|
| AVS-risk methodology | How AVS exposure, operator behavior, slashing surface, and oracle inputs should map into collateral policy. |
| LRT collateral framework | How candidate LRT collateral should be evaluated before any supported-list claim exists. |
| Slashing-insurance design | How protocol fees, coverage accounting, and payout constraints should be framed before implementation. |
| Looping / leverage | How recursive supply-borrow loops should be described as a risk envelope, not as a yield promise. |
| Comparisons | How to compare Lyrasing against Aave, Morpho, Symbiotic, EigenLayer, and LRT-specific markets without marketing shortcuts. |
| Roadmap | How the documentation and protocol research tracks are staged without date promises. |
| Contributors | How future contributors should engage with risk, docs, and protocol-design work. |
Current status
Phase 3 now has substantive page groups for concept framing, AVS-risk methodology, LRT collateral review, slashing-insurance design, looping / leverage, comparisons, and the Roadmap / Contributors close-out. The remaining Phase 3 work is quality-oriented: docs performance diagnostics, static-export checks, layout stability, and broader source-accuracy review.
Source posture
Crypto-domain claims should stay source-backed. Citations are kept close to the terms that need them; longer source evidence belongs in the relevant session report.